Wednesday, 30 December 2009

More world solutions brought to you by baby nose technology

Guys, sorry there was no Christmas post.. There would've been, honest, but i was kinda feasting and gift trading and such. Anyway, in other news:


Do you ever find yourself ill, sitting on your bed/ sofa/ wherever trying to sleep with a solidly blocked nose and sore throat, thinking to yourself:


THAT THING! That thing there in his face! That's what i fucking need!

Well, i totally agree. Someone somewhere (probably me) needs to start packaging these and selling them to the general public. Breathing is important all year round, even when you have a cold, so we really need to start getting this kind of technology out there to the people.
Just think of it, insert a tube in your nose, probably have to use some cleanser or something (ok i admit i don't know anything about the procedure whatsoever) and then you can sleep.. AND breathe AT THE SAME GODDAMN TIME!!!!

In case it hasn't been sold well enough to you yet, lets go over some further advantages:

  • you will be able to sleep, meaning you can recover faster
  • you will feel less like shit the next day because you got some sleep
  • you will not have to blow your noise every 2 minutes to stay alive
  • you will consequently use up less boxes of tissues
  • your throat will not become more sore and painful because of all that breathing you've had to do
  • you will not have to get up every 30 mins to drink a gallon of water because your throat is so dry
  • you will be able to swallow water (and take pills) without fear of drowning yourself because you can now breathe
  • your life will inherently be a lot better in a great many ways

And everything, generally, will just be awesome because of the tubes.

I swear, i'm gonna be a millionaire with this shit!

Monday, 21 December 2009

Thoughts from the Darkest Day

The winter is my favourite time of year. Today, the darkest day, is one of my favourite days. The other is in 4 days time and the other other is in 10 days time.


As per fortnightly monday, i went to see my business advisor, Andi. I was told to do some canvassing (visiting places to advertise my business to them) last week, and i did go out and talk to a handful of people, but not very many and i didn't get any work. Still, i did go and chat to the printers, and i did update my website, and i did get myself a photographer, but still, no money was made, so disappointment.

So Andi recommended i have another go and keep trying. Then i had to ask.. is it worth calling Anyone over the christmas period? "Well, you may as well take a week off." Andi explained. The main events, christmas and new year fall in midweek this year, so there will barely be any proper working days for the next fortnight. I'm pretty much shut off from doing any canvassing even if i wanted to.

On my way back (remember, this is mid day) i pass the construction site above. Usually busy and noisey, the only movement i could see was the crane swinging above and a beeping tone from an alarm somewhere deep within. I figure little is going to happen here for the next fortnight. I remember back at the OS, everything would shut down for the full two weeks. The eerie silence is like a foretelling of what is about to happen: The country is going into its annual hibernation for the darkest days of the year before waking up in the next decade, which will start with twenty-ten, people!

Still, this is a positive thing. What do you make of it all, Spider?


Agreed.

Sunday, 20 December 2009

Steampunk adventures

Right now, in the fair city of oxford, one can find the most delightful history of science museum. And deep, nestled within its historical sciencey bosom lies the extraordinary exhibition of:


When i mentioned this exhbition to my dad, i was faced with the dilemna of having to explain what steampunk is. The concept is essntially modern victorian technology, and you've no doubt seen it in film, games, comics and the like. Imagine if technology had continued with its great advances but stayed in gorgeous mahogany cases, elaborate metal work, and wired with excessive piping with exposed valves and gears.

It actually took us a while to find. As you'd expect from two people who've worked at the ordnance survey, we misread the first tourist map, couldn't find anything on the second map and weren't sure where we were on the third map. Regardless, we stumbled on it eventually.


The exhibition wasn't massive, but high in quality. Here's my top picks. If you like these, i may post more as there is lots more. Please, please click and see them at their original size cos i made them all lovely and high res, just for you guys.

Firemans leather mask:


Fetishistic mask #2



'The steampunk man' was a lot of people's favourite by the seems:


A rearing spider. It has cogs in it and everything *shivers*



My second favourite (or possibly my favourite?) piece. What is it? a mechanical womb, complete with countdown timer.



These are actual working machines. they have candles inside that power the machines with hot air. There were several there but they weren't working. The artist has f***ing loads, but i thought this was the cutest.


This guy is straight from studio ghibli.

I love this guy, he's just so indie!

A working webcam (yes that is really me):



This is my favourite: the barnstormer, of course. It is literally too awesome for cameras. It is so detailed, the camera cannot focus on anything, so the pictures are pretty bad. Hence, may i refer you to the artists website, where you can see his other insane projects, including the mighty church tank and gertrude von howitzerhen.
Nevertheless, i am happy to dedicate a whole 1% of my massive picture space to this masterpiece. If you could see it better, among many other things, you'd see:
  • 4 different sizes of people
  • a reindeer
  • a man with a cock on his head
  • tools stashed on the side of the ship, including a spade, pickaxe and a crucifix
  • a small man standing on a medium gun, or a medium man standing on a large gun
  • a hollow horse
  • a giant soldier with mechanical arms who is actually part of a tank
  • what kinda looks like a flame thrower at the front
  • a man having lunch in a jet cone
  • small people sitting on the steps under the drivers feet
  • at least 2 upside down horses
  • a figurehead with guns for eyes









Well thats all today folks. /sigh now i gotta think of a title :(

Do you know what day it is?

at 10 am yesterday, i was pretty sure i heard cat noises downstairs. Weird, because we don't have a cat, right? Well apparently, i was wrong.

My housemate has been banging on about getting a cat since she moved back in and realised i was a 'cat person'. Since the landlord is a pretty easy going fellow, he said he'd think about it. Eventually he took me out to lunch to ask me my thoughts. Frankly? I was both for and against the idea. On the one hand i've got all the time in the world for cats. On the other hand, i don't think you should be allowed to have one if you can't treat it properly. The house doesn't have a cat flap, so the cat can't go outside. The obvious solution is a litter tray, but like, that isn't the issue. There's more to cats than just eating and pooing. Cats were domesticated for a specialist purpose: To hang about the place killing things. Cats should be allowed to go outside and hunt animals in my opinion. Else it's not fair, why've you got one? It's like, cat's rights.

She said she would find an 'indoor' one (at this point the cat lover in me cringes.. it's like handbag dogs) but it seems she knew what she wanted, and the landlord eventually agreed. There's a cat sanctuary she visits and she found the one there. Her name is Pippin. or Pickle? I think? I think Amanda said Pippin but then her friend came over and im sure she said 'hi Pickle!' so, i dont quite know..

Last night Amanda went out so it was just me and Pipkin/ Pippa?, and the gorgeous variety of toys Amanda has bought for her, which i have to say i'm impressed by. Complete with a cat tent and furry scratchy decks- photos of these will follow, so be patient and check back later, cat-toy-fans.

Anyway i took the opportunity to take a few pictures of Pikka/ Pikkin?, enjoy.



a cat's day isn't complete without a ritual snake killing!


NNNNnnnngh! die snake!

Well, thats all from Pipple/ Picklekin/ Pipplekin? today. Perhaps more soon..

Is your room a bit of a mess?

Yes.


Actually, that isn't too bad, that's a good day. Anyway, images for 2 new, more interesting posts are gathering together as we speak.

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

The ignorant and offensive get their rocks off at christmas

Coming up to my favourite time of year, folks! sweet times. Or at least it was, until the "we're-much-better-than-you-because-YOU-celebrate-winter-for-all-the-wrong-reasons" brigade came to my attention.




Ok first let me cover my ass and say I've got nothing against the Christians who just wanna get their Christmas on. I don't see it as much different from people celebrating Diwali around bonfire night, or Passover near Easter. Actually, it's a bit like the time Easter fell on my birthday and I was all like, well I'll just celebrate them equally (but secretly more my birthday). People clamouring to celebrate at the same time of year is pretty much just one of those awkward, bumping into someone in a corridor and not sure which way to go around them moments.. embarrassing, but it happens.

What gets me is the whole "well obviously you guys are only celebrating the darkest days of winter because of us, the Christians, so stop celebrating it by any other name!! its about us, so do as we say!!" Or worse, and this is what really gets me, people who are like, "this is a christian nation!" WELL, deary, let me tell ya something.


Humans have been living in britain for over 30,000 years and have been observing the seasons, including winter, every one of those years. This country was only truly 'christian' for about 700 years max, and that was pretty recently. Lets just consider that timeline for a minute: It almost implies that humanity did not spontaneously spawn in this country at the announcement of jesus, and has, in fact, started moving on since everyone's getting over it now.

Furthermore, the formation of the United Kingdom, our current 'nation', took place in 1707- in the age of enlightenment- not in the christian dark ages. This country and its culture were never 'founded' on 'christian' values. This isn't America, not that there was even any unanimous agreement that America was ever truly founded on christian values anyway.

And finally, may I make the point that even jesus' homeland won't be celebrating his birthday, and they never have done. Is that because they're ignorant and offensive and don't care? Of course it isn't, you silly tossers. It's because they didn't let people redefine their culture.

I like to think this is all very much akin to roman britons of the 5th century, clinging to what dignity remained in their roman citizenship crying "why does nobody pray to jupiter anymore!! you worthless, uncivilised heathens! Without us and our superior culture you and your pathetic country will never amount to anything!!" But sadly I wasn't around to check that anyone actually said that.

No offense to Christians, of course (whips out "I'm agnostic, actually" card) you're more than welcome to celebrate the season how you want. I'm just not down with all this "We're a christian nation damnit, and you will sing about jesus!" gobshite, because 1) We aren't, and 2) I won't.

Tuesday, 8 December 2009

Star love

After comments on the last post i did a bit of research into pulsar planets, and found this little diagram detailing just another one of those real life abusive intersteller romances.


You know, innocent sun is all happy with its little pet jovian, then along comes dark and mysterious neutron star, seduces sun into an affair and dumps the previous partner. Everything looks happy for them.. but turns out neutron star just wants sun for its matter! And rapes sun for everything it has! It's a sad story and one we see too often. On the plus side, the jovian wasn't harmed, at least, it seems not.. perhaps jovians just keep all the pain inside. You never know with a jovian.

Interesting fact: PSR B1620-26 b, the jovian of the story, is the oldest known planet. It was born only a billion years after the universe was born. Crazy times.

Sunday, 6 December 2009

UV wax + boredom =

Just a quick post to let you all know that incredibly, i'm still still alive, and what i've been upto this evening:

Today i rediscovered my UV body crayons, so naturally i tried to melt them onto myself. It actually turned out to be very un-viable, I could only scrape off and melt a bit of wax at a time, and i only had a hair dryer to melt it with. Also the wax cracked easily, as you can see in the last picture.. all gone. Hence i gave up after a while, so the colouring is only half complete :(

I will be sure to buy a candle at some point so i can melt them easier and make a better effort and a different design, so stay tuned. Anyway this is what it looks like, only, it was a trillion times cooler in real life because UV glowiness rocks, but this is as good as my camera does..








P.S. just to let you know, there are more posts in the bag, they just havent made it out my brain yet.

Sunday, 29 November 2009

and the 100th post is...

A big picture what i done drew.


I might tell you about it tomorrow, but theres not much to say, and i want to sleep first.

Night

Friday, 27 November 2009

dvds

Guys, i have a terrible dvd collection, and i dont want them anymore, so i am going to give them away for free. It will save you money and let me clear some space.
I know theres a lot of eastern films in there.. i went through a brief phase of interest and i had a couple of friends (well namely chris) who just kept giving them to me. To be honest, several of them i have not even seen. Actually, about half of these were given to me by various people, i'm really not a dvd person.

DVDS
Evangelion 1-8
sci-bots 'zalo' (i may just charge you 5p for this)
Hero
Arahan
star wars 1-6 (or 4-3, depending on your geek level)
Warrior King
Ong Bak
Time Bandits
azumi
dark city
seven swords
casshern
donnie darko
Animatrix
dark crystal
labyrinth (yes with the david bowie)
battle royale
Spirited away
Moulin rouge
Save the green planet (misleading title.. its a korean horror)
Excel saga vol 2 (no, theres no vol 1. dont ask.)
kai doh naru
ghost in the shell
kill bill pt 1
infernal affairs trilogy


GAMES
psychonauts
project zero
viewtiful joe
splinter cell chaos theory
splinter cell pandora tomorrow
final fantasy 7
brave soul (japanese hentai pc game, never got it to work myself)
GTA vice city (pc)


several of these will get taken to CEX anyway if no one wants them.

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

clarkson according to me

Ok after a discussion last night i've decided to make this rant public- for future reference.



Jeremy Clarkson. He's a very funny man. But i do not respect his opinion on cars. Normally when i say this, people jump back and/ or look at me with disgust and patronisingly ask why. So here it is.

Firstly, i'll admit the opinion is not entirely my own- i inherited it from my dad. But that's ok, because he designs cars, and if you're going to get an opinion on cars, may as well be from the man behind the drawing board actually designing the damn things.

Anyway, his (and my) opinion on Mr Clarkson is many fold:

The most obvious first of all it's Jeremy's rudeness towards cars he doesn't like. This can't really be helped because he is a reporter and, well, rudeness gets laughs. Still my dad's thoughts can be summed up when he accidentally won a raffle to drive a tank over a ford car, but he refused: 'Some poor buggar had to design that'. To the rest of the world a car is just a metal object that materialised in germany or wherever, but, for some poor buggar it put the dinner on the table for him and his family. Even shit cars take years of effort to make.

As said though, this really can't be helped. But it's worth noting this a little hint at the distance he puts between the car buyers and the industry. Let me explain more.

Environmentalism. Jeremy Clarkson has been pretty blunt about not liking it. You could almost say he promotes the petrolhead, anti-environmentalist attitude on his show. That's fine, that's his personal opinion.. but he is so out of step with the automotive industry it's almost a crime that he's allowed to be seen as the face of it.
The bottom line is, the automotive industry is one big, powerful industry. It is backed and funded by some of the most rich and powerful oil merchants in the world. If engineers didn't want to become environmentalist, they wouldn't have to. In fact, there are oil companies who actively do not want the car industry to pursue environmentalism, and engineers have had to fight, reason and bypass them for any change at all. Why would automotive employees want environmentalism? Let's take a look.

Money and jobs. Research into alternative fuels, research into improved fuel efficiency, the redesign of engines, the manufacture new engines, testing of new cars.. all vast businesses in themselves and these all create vital jobs. Clarkson may like to see the same ideals rehashed in every car ever made but sadly for him the industry doesn't. When you're using something old and established you're minimising jobs and that doesn't go down well with trade unions and employees. I mean, there's a limit to how many jobs adding extra cup holders can make, and people certainly haven't been working 25 years in the industry to make a bit of plastic with a hole in it. More and more research is being done into alternative design, like electric cars, plant fuel and even speed record breaking steam cars.. and guess what, the industry is healthier and livelier for it.
Then there's the selling bit. If people are switching on to environmentalism, they'll buy things with that mark. If you're the first to produce a car with that selling point, you've got a niche on the market. If you can produce a car that's better at it than the last, you've got an edge over your competitors. these are very good things. Now if only you could stop TV presenters getting the public to laugh at them..

Then theres the fact that people in the automotive industry are.. well, people. They aren't evil, mindless pollution-bent monsters like you see on captain planet, they're intelligent, well meaning humans like you and me. They live on the earth too, they eat food too, many have kids or grandkids or want to have kids. The majority are clever, well educated people with sound scientific understanding. When they watch wildlife programmes or read science magazines they care about that stuff just like anyone else would. When my dad tells me about things like the ethanol fuelled cars of south america, or his visitations to the steam car land speed project, he isnt just making it all up to look noble and cool to environmentalists, its because he is an engineer and engineers find this stuff interesting. So please, just stop treating them like they hate the earth, okay? Even if you think you're standing up for them. Actually, especially if. And if you do nothing else, stop blindly agreeing with what you hear from funny men on TV.

So essentially, my thoughts are this. He is a journalist, and he does the job well because he's engaging and he can talk about cars, but he is not a representative of the industry. Think about how many times he's ever had someone from the actual industry on his show to talk about the cars. Or even cars in general- and no, owning a car does not automatically make you an expert. The majority of information comes from his mouth in the form of his opinion, which is no better connected to the automotive world than anyone else's. But most importantly, when he promotes an opinion that goes against the thoughts of the industry, he's essentially standing in the way of progress. And that is why i do not respect his opinion on cars.

Sunday, 8 November 2009

Noobs? But why?

[Ive decided to create a new post tag. Its going to be called 'parapost.' These happen when i find a post on the internet that is so mind-wrenchingly stupid that i barely need to change a few words (for the sake of plagiarism) and the rest mocks itself.

I resent the source of today's parapost, and apologise profusely, because 1. it's pissing me off that i've ended up writing about WoW more than usual lately, and 2. I only subscribed to wow.com so i can laugh at the horrendously socially defective people who write it. Still, here it is, and i urge you to read the original too so that you know i'm not joking.
]


by Lou Zerr, Nov 8th 2009 at 2:00PM

Here's a perplexing thought. We've already talked about how blizzard is revamping the newbie experience, but we want to know: For whom? I mean everyone I know started playing since launch day and is level 80 now. Sure, when I occasionally take breaks from my 24/7 raiding for this week's latest top-rated gear, I have spotted the odd sub-level79 newbie pipsqueek running about the place. But these are only bored level 80 players replaying the whole game on another character, right? And they have already played the game and naturally won't want it changed, so why update it?

It's an interesting question. Neth, a blizzard moderator, answers pretty tamely, saying that new players are one of those things you get in games, and apparently they like to have fun, too. It's almost like Blizzard is actually anticipating some of these inexperienced newbie types to join the game.. could this be as ridiculous as it sounds?

If so (and lets face it, when a game is 5 years old, why would anyone think about revamping it?) where could these people possibly come from? Are they actually thinking of selling Catacylsm to new players as well or something? I mean obviously catacylsm will bring people back to the game, but I'd assume that most regular gamers have already played WoW and/or another game at some point. [huh? ed.]

Since Wow only normally recieves an average of 2 million new players a year, something must be afoot or else blizzard wouldn't be expecting anymore newbies like, at all. But what? The WoW movie is mentioned by a few players, and that's certainly a possibility [Are you joking? ed.]. The Battle.net system might also help Starcraft II players find out about World of Warcraft. These are the only two sources i can think of, and even when combined they probably won't bring enough players for blizzard to justify making work for their ridiculously overfunded company.

Unless Blizzard has something else up their sleeve -- something like WoW going free-to-play or giving us extra bonuses for selling off more friends' souls. Maybe that would explain why they're making leveling easier. [um rather than because adding more content makes top level harder to reach? ed.] Whatever it is, Blizzard definitely thinks the newbie hordes are coming. As with so much of this game, we'll have to wait and see. [You're a retard. ed.]

Monday, 19 October 2009

A day in the week of October

Guess what people, i'm not dead.. and ive got posts to prove it.


It may be autumn here, but elsewhere in the solar system..
Theres a little robot on Mars travelling across the meridiani plain to reach the endeavor crater (not the one pictured). Didya know that? huh? huh? It's now been travelling over a year, taking pictures and sending back data from its journey along the way. It's unbearably cute and wondrous, but im surprised nasa didnt just let it land at the crater, poor thing. That said, i'm a great believer in what can be learnt and enjoyed from the journey rather than from the ending, so really, i understand.





As webcomics go, my interest is below average. The warcraft webcomic world is another universe of itself, and there seems to be quite a lot of variety. But i still take a bit of convincing.
It is interesting though that the range of styles mirrors the range of players you get. Ultimately, it reflects the two main categories. You've got the creative, imaginative types that play to explore the world, get mixed up in the story for a month, and go away making up their own little story arcs (as if we weren't having trouble keeping up with blizzard's already). It tends to vary from in-character sketches to long, winding sagas. It's become such a scene blizzard have started taking entries and publishing their favourite fan stories which are sold alongside the official manga.


Then there are the self absorbed groupie types who digitally hang out together to go raiding with their "guildies" *twitch* and who approach the game as simply something to fill the social void in their lives.. No offence to these people. Their comics are mostly players making 'witty' observations about 'noobs' (which seems to mean people with anything less than 5 epic-geared lvl 80s... so about 95% of WoW players) and, you know, in jokes. Ok to be fair, they occasionally get it right.. but still.. I can't help my disgust at those with the pissy 'Oh you need at least X of stat Y to play' attitudes and the embarrassingly struggling grip on reality. Um, so you can probably guess which category i relate to.
Lastly, it's also nice to see the number that are produced by girl players. Because despite what people may have you believe, girls do play. Incidentally, i didnt find all these myself, im not that sad. I cheated.


The other day some stuff happened that made charlie brooker, derren brown and stephen fry all feel very important, more so than usual, and they all still are by the sounds. If somehow you missed it because, i don't know, you were on holiday in a the middle of the sahara desert and the batteries had gone flat on all your internet compatible devices- in which case i'm very sorry to hear that and i cant imagine how you survived- this should sum it up for you.
But the original article is really very boring. If you'd like a better translation of it, this one translates perfectly.


Um, For now, thats all i've got..

Sunday, 11 October 2009

Mass debate all over the world

WARNING. This is a VERY long and possibly boring post. It has been a long time coming, though please don't take that as an indication of the quality you should expect. This is really just the sum of something i've been interested in for some time.

Being a citizen of the internet, i cannot help but observe a lot of talk referring to some kind of upcoming 'end is nigh' that is due pretty soon. Various end-of-days prophecies include the 'end' of the Mayan calender, global warming, the manifestation of the new world order, and the second coming of jesus.
I'm not so much interested in the prophecies- i've heard them so many times. What interests me is everyones thoughts on the destiny and purpose of mankind.

In britain, we have a compact and rich enough culture that we have a relatively consistant vision of society. On the whole, we all seem to share core beliefs: Science is real, education is good, music is important, no one has to be christian if they don't want to be and there is nothing wrong with a good fantasy about elves and wizards.

Certain larger, younger cultures are a little more schizophrenic and polarised about the topic. Different groups tug at society to bring them round to their way of thought before it's too late. At first it seems there are two teams, the filthy, peace-loving liberals vs the hateful, fundamentalist republicans. But the more i expose myself to american media the more it seems apparent there are in fact several, seperate areas of tension, not necessarily all running parallel with each other: Not all scientists are atheists, some christians respect nature, and not all satanists actually adopt individualism.

The following is simply an analysis of some of the moral conflicts i see coming out of america right now, in my view, so far. I've included links so you cant accuse me of making it up. Make what you will of it.. debate is very welcome.




CHRISTIANITY VS PAGANISM
-Humanity vs Nature-

This is about those that see humanity as the centre of everything; and those that see humanity as a tiny part of a bigger, deeper world. 'Christian' and 'Pagan' are old terms- but many modern day values and ideas derive from their ancient schools of thought.

Team 1: Take a look at abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam.. The deities are human like, the baddies are beast-like. It presents humans as above animals. God is only interested in human affairs and for them it is debatable if animals even have souls. At its heart is a god justifying anything man does as long as it keeps up the worship. The existence of nature is a mere footnote in mankind's story.

Team 2: On the other hand, Pagans- and this really applies to native religions globally- personify all aspects of the earth, life, and celestial bodies. Hills, springs, rocks, trees.. all of these maybe haunted or personified by other worldly spirits. These spirits are not always humanlike, and aren't always around for human benefit. They just exist because that's what the world is like. In scandinavia especially, entire valleys and mountains were left untouched out of respect for the sprits there. This view sees mankind in a humble place as piece of nature, not an authority above it.

The clash:
We know about the environmentalist movement. Global warming, concern for animal welfare and the recent interest in organic and sustainable farming. But not everyone is ok with this.
If i may quote a christian describing pagan values: "Neo-Pagan-Borderline-Satanic-the-Environment-is-more-important-than-human-life beliefs."

Another, more blunt article explains:
"The environmental movement is consumed with trying to preserve the planet forever, and we know this is not God's plan". "So we see that rather than trying to preserve the earth for thousands or even millions of years to come, we are to be good stewards of it for as long as it lasts"
..Interesting. The latter author points out the bible says 'Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it'. Apparently judgment day will come before our resources run out, so we should go ahead, reproduce as much as possible and use them up. You can see how this isn't going to work with environmentalism, can't you.

The Georgia Guidestones. One rule dictates the human population should not exceed 500,000,000 and stay in balance with nature. So the pagans say we should control our numbers, the christians say we should mulitply as much as possible and god will sort it all out when he gets back. I see an ethical shit storm brewing.
This almost 'fuck nature, we're humans!' view seems to reflect a subtle sentiment weaved into all kinds of christian messages, political decisions, and, frequent troll attacks on science websites..

..Back in the day science and Christianity were good buddies. But the day science claimed we were not the centre of the universe- and we orbited the sun- was the day science fell out of favour with Christianity. And everyday since then, as science continues to map mankind's tiny place in the universe, his evolution from the animals, and the huge physical systems beyond his control, the wider that gap grows. And science is reminded every single day of it.



FAITH VS SCIENCE
-Ignorance vs Enlightenment-

At first this looks like an extension of the last paragraph but actually, the conflict between science and religion involves a little more. Over the last 2,000 years alone, humanity has apparently fluctuated between times of 'enlightenment' (when criticism and logic have been favoured) and times of 'faith' (when 'gods word' dictated everything, and the bible was to be read literally).

Team 1: Those who like scientific thought, see technology and education as something that can help humanity achieve great things, and see faith merely holding humanity back in a state of blind ignorance, or 'darkness', as in the 'dark ages'.

Team 2: Then there are those who condemn modern technology in the name of faith- the catholic church being an excellent example. They see radical thought and change as unstable and the work of the devil, destined to bring war, unrest and 'unsaved souls' upon the world.

The clash:
To put this conflict in very literal terms, let me explain the Luciferians. That's right- people that follow lucifer. Make what you will of most of this article, i'd like to quote him to sum up this "Luciferian" view:
'God of the material world is seen as a stubborn and sadistic figure who seeks to keep mankind into perpetual darkness, while Lucifer is the savior of humanity by giving it the gift of knowledge. If we reinterpret the Adam and Eve story through Luciferian glasses, the serpent is actually the “undercover savior” who defied God and gave humans the opportunity to become gods themselves. He is credited to have unleashed man’s awesome potential.'
In short, Luciferians don't see Lucifer- the "light bringer"(hence the terms 'illuminati' and 'enlightened')- as a destroyer of humanity, but a creator of humanity.. reverse engineering the world and teaching it to mankind, breaking them away from the animals and closer to godliness. By gaining knowledge and questioning god's world, we are denying the fear and power god holds over us- the pope's worst nightmare. Science, in a religious leaders' view, is an anti-god revolution led by Satan.

Of course this isn't exclusive to religion, we see it in society everywhere because it reflects more fundamental politics: People choose to educate others. Perhaps this isn't as much faith vs reason, as a battle between those who see benefit in distributing knowledge, and those who see benefit in restricting it. And then there is the problem of how much and what knowledge is distributed or withheld. And then, the extra problem of what to replace the void left by ignorance.. something charming like superstition, or something more.. manipulative, like fear?

A cute example of the transition from ignorant peasantry to enlightened living in the modern world is here. Note the other villagers even refer to the windmills as 'witchcraft' when the crops fail..



RELIGION VS ATHEISM
-Order vs Chaos-

It is the general popular belief that order is good and chaos is evil. This is the general popular belief. There is no reason to assume, of course, that authorities and law abiders cannot do evil (think: holocaust) and the rebels and lawless cannot do good (think: robin hood). But because of the very nature of maintaining 'Order', it is important that the former is the general popular belief of the masses.

According to a recent poll, the most distrusted minority group in america are atheists. They are more distrusted than gays, muslims, and afro-americans. This is a country resident to godhatesfags.com and the KKK.
Richard Dawkins, an atheist who preaches with as much passion as even the most religious preacher, did an interview on american tv, demonstrating how american feathers are ruffled by atheism. Yes, Bill is an utter dickface, but he raises some common arguments. Hitler was an athiest! is the cry. Translation: Atheism makes people evil. Evil dictators, revolutionists, terrorists.. No wait, scratch that last one.. Even following the religion of an enemy is apparently better than not following one at all.

I get the feeling the issue here is not really as simple as religion vs non religion, It's:

Team 1:
people that are trusted by a community- or heavily religious culture- because they share common values with it,
vs
Team 2: those that do not follow any traditional religious moral code, and thus seem weird or untrustworthy to team 1.

People are scared by what is not obvious to them and warm quickly to those who think and act alike. It's easy for people who've been brought up in a tight community to be brainwashed into assuming the worst of a stranger; Which, in turn, reinforces their need to demonstrate their loyalty to the communal values.. regardless of how hard they are to defend or how obvious it is their daughter is a lesbian or should really have an abortion.

The clash
So on the surface, religions appear to have 'order' pretty well pegged. They collect everyone under a single code or deity, preaching that unity brings peace. A single set of values, a single philosophy, a single vision of justice. They can decide on any rule and the masses will follow, regardless of how many steps back it takes them or how it threatens their environment.
But.. as christianity has shown, even for global mass-brainwashing religions this isnt quite so straight forward. The reality is, everyone's got their own 'vision' of justice, and in many cases, they would rather change the religion to resemble their vision than change the vision resemble the religion. And its not hard to have an excuse.. hell, divorcing your wife so you can get another is as good a reason as any.
As religion spreads, more humans take it on and go their own place with it. If religion actually brought order, history would be different. Truth is, we are adaptable creatures and as we spread, we have to adapt, and our values adapt too. Order has to be abandoned and rebuilt, or just partially abandoned altogether. Atheism is not a big leap. Maybe between chaos and order, neither extreme is possible to realistically sustain, due to the inherently unavoidable 'context sensitive' nature of human behaviour.

Tuesday, 29 September 2009

'News for your neurons', or those of you who have some

Right. Im fucking sick of this. I am through to the back fucking teeth.

DEAR WIRED.COM COMMENTORS,
YOUR COMMENTS FUCKING SUCK. ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID. AM I SPEAKING IN SMALL ENOUGH SENTENCES FOR YOU. CAN YOU READ THIS WITHOUT CAPS LOCK. try this. oh, you can't. SORRY I MEAN OH, YOU CAN'T. ergh, i give up already.


-Case 01-

Ok lets start with todays one. It's an article about electric fish. You know, eels & stuff. Utterly fascinating. Anyway, the comments: You probably won't believe me so i took a screenshot:


..What the hell?
"Hi guys, just in case for some reason you can't read the last 4 comments, thought i'd just let you know 100hz is a low buzz and not a high whine, even though obviously, such descriptions are entirely relative."
I can't decide if these guys have some mental condition which makes them assume Wired can only read their comments; or if they all had some extreme derren-brown-subliminal-brainwash moment and just mindlessly re-iterated the first thing they saw in their peripheral vision, instead of whatever they meant to put. Any thoughts?


-Case 02-

Ok this is one that comes up every fucking time an article contains the word evolution in it. This article is on Darwin. Yeh, can you believe a science mag did an article evolution? Oh yeh! They so went there. Wired have - and i would normally disagree with censorship, but here i think it is totally justified- removed the bulk of troll comments. Never the less, odd gems remain:

Posted by: Kyle | 02/11/09 | 9:32 pm
may i suggest you leave this kinds [sic] of topics alone. bad move wired. i am a huge fan but not with this stuff.
Posted by: Anonymous | 02/11/09 | 6:54 pm
False Teaching

Posted by: Anonymous | 02/11/09 | 8:21 pm
“— and there are lots of big, unanswered questions”. That’s why it’s a therory, [sic] not a law.

Posted by: Eternal | 02/12/09 | 12:21 am
200 years later and 64% of the American populace still realizes that intelligent design makes more sense than evolution. Only 26% of the population is so close-minded they won’t look at the evidence that doesn’t support their theory.

Posted by: Scott | 02/12/09 | 3:24 am
Science gone mad. Using scientific method, noone could be serious that evolution makes sense. Find a new theory and stop trying to be clever.


What.. the hell? What kind of magazine did these people imagine they were reading? Its got "WIRED SCIENCE" written across the top in full capitals, bright green ones at that. Were these people expecting some kind of creationist sermon? Ok so even you honestly believe your religion cannot co exist with evolution, that's not an excuse to be a moron.. right?


-Case 03-

Here's another one, that, being a SCIENCE magazine, wired cannot help but occasionally report on. It's about the environment, and how some scientists have been able to peg down environmental thresholds before human civilisation is threatened. Note, it is a SCIENCE magazine, reporting on what some scientists say they have found.



Ah, the good old 'We-armchair-readers-know-better-than-trained-scientists' brigade.. it wouldn't be a wired post without them. Again: what did they think they were reading? "Oh hey, look at this mag! they've got an article on earth science! What are they, some kind of SCIENCE MAGAZINE!?" I think you're getting my point by now.


-Case 04-

Finally, although by no means the last example- jeez, we've barely scratched the surface here- a potentially ethical article. The article basically says some scientists have found that torture is a flawed method of interrogation because stress affects recall negatively, as well as affecting memory function itself in prolonged cases. Note that the article doesn't really touch on any ethical or moral ideas about torture.
Not that wired commentors would have noticed.

Posted by: PJW11 | 09/21/09 | 1:33 pm
So torture is bad. Alrighty then, we have the moral high ground. At least until it gets blown up from underneath us. It’s like being a pacifist yet expecting a police officer to defend you if you’re being burglarized, you can’t demand security from groups willing to torture you and then pick and choose how you will be defended.

For those of you who don't speak moron, I offer a translation: "dddduuugh, cant read."

Posted by: PR3DA7OR1AL | 09/21/09 | 2:59 pm
Waterboarding, sleep deprivation, stress positions (such as seperating one from many) and the exploitation of phobias are all used TO BREAK A PERSON DOWN TO AN EMOTIONAL LEVEL.

Again: Probably cant read. Yes, torture breaks people down to an emotional level. Congratulations. Now go back and read the article again and observe what it has to say about that emotional level interfering with memory reliability. You are looking for information remember.. not emotions.. remember? Oh, maybe you just didn't care. I get the feeling your interest in torture has absolutely nothing to do with military intelligence. So why comment on the article? Just get yourself on down to your local BDSM club!


Oh, i could go on and on. Take for example, how the comments on this and this article completely disagree about wired's ulterior agenda for Apple. It's just bizarre. Where the hell do these readers come from? Maybe they should do an article about that.

Friday, 25 September 2009

With half the race gone, theres only half the race still to go

In my [second from] last post i left you guys on a cliffhanger, wondering whether the next post would be today, tomorrow or yesterday. If you correctly guessed 'today', congratulations! You must be psychic, you freak!!


Back in my latter teen years, i lived with my dad in a little 2-bedroom terraced cottage in the village. Downstairs we had a little kitchen, and a dingy bathroom, but there was no living room. Instead, the huge area of space formerly the lounge was my dad's office.

My father is an 'engineer consultant', meaning folks hire him to design engine parts [for cars, bikes & others] and/or explain to them why their previous rubbish designs have gone horridly wrong. His desks- and usually the chairs, floor and rest of the room- would be covered in drawing tools, A1 design sheets, computers & peripherals and most interestingly- aluminum prototypes of the parts he was working on. He would bring them back from the factory and conveniently dump them on the floor in the one spot i was most likely to trip over or bash into them- a careless injury we both fell victim to several times, but he just never seemed to learn from.

I would come in from school or college each day and it wasn't hard to tell how my dad's day had been. Some days i would be flatly ignored. Other days i'd walk in to be greeted by an ecstatic HELLO!; have some cylinder head model shown to me and asked what did i think. In pretty much both cases i hadn't a clue what i was supposed to say.

Given the good relationship i have with my dad, the fact i lived in his office a few years and met many of his colleagues, it does seem strange that i've never been exposed much to the industry he works in. I've never been to any races before so the racing industry is an alien world to me. So, when he invited me, it was with mixed anticipation that i went along to see his latest project working for Embassy Racing, WF01, race at Silverstone, in the final round of this years Le Mans Test Series.

Le Mans, 'The grand prix of endurance racing' is the grand prix for sports cars. Unlike formula one- a dull sprint for race drivers in prototypes that are only built to survive the race- These are actually intended to be real cars for real people on real roads. The main race lasts a full 24 hours(!). It is accompanied by the test series- in which cars race for, oh, "only" 6 hours. Also, rather than the Formula1-esque procession around the track, four classes race at different speeds on the track at the same time. Each car only competes with other cars in the same class, but they all have to negotiate each others traffic. The race the long, cars often do not make it to the end and positions are constantly changing.

Saturday was test day, and rich-people-get-your-old-museum-cars-out day, so we went down to the pits to check up on Team WFR - formerly Embassy Racing until they went bankrupt last year- and their car, WF01.
Apparently the night before they'd had, well, a bit of a crash. The back half of the body work was in a big pile lying around outside, with dazed mechanic dude casually picking bits up wondering what would be good to take home for the kids.




fortunately, race teams pack spares, so the car won't be racing like this.




As you can i see.. it was one of those times when i didn't think to bring a camera. Hence the shakey pics off my dads phone.

Surprisingly, I didn't get bored, to both my and my dads delight, in fact i enjoyed it so much i agreed to come back the next day for the full 6 hour course.

The car did pretty damn well. About an hour in it reached 3rd place in P2 class. It then reached 2nd place which it held for an hour, causing my dad to bounce around in his seat. Then, with a couple of hours left, something went wrong and they had to get back to the pits. Apparently something to do with a generator? They lost a lot of time but got it back out. The car made up laps and managed to get 4th place, respectable given the circumstances. The final race results are here (p2 class are in blue). And, if you're really sad and geeky, the timings and mid-race results are here.

We didn't leave empty handed though, dad went back to the pits to pick up something dazed mechanic dude had promised for him- a trophy from the smashed car body work, which, having also designed, he was immensely pleased with. When we got home he cut it in half and gave me half.. which was pretty immense. So: if u ever see a chunk of carbon fibre lying around in my room, you all know what it's from.



If you look closely at the first picture you can probably work out where it's from.. it's off the main chunk, at the bottom- which was once originally the middle in between the back wheels. The lump goes over a joint in the rear wheel suspension. The edges have been taped over with gaffa tape, after he cut his finger on the rough edge earlier. At least that's one careless injury he did learn from.

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

Peado on the street

Guys, i need your advice. I think there's a peado on our street, and i'm not sure what to do. Ok i'll explain.
Yesterday i was walking back to the house and the weird neighbour guy was hanging around outside his house with the kids of our street like he often does. He looks kinda old and sleazy you know like how peados do. And he started talking to me and asked my name, then pointed to himself and slowly goes 'Clarence' like i'm some non-english-speaking polish person. And the kids go, 'you can call him Clary' which is a shit name but its like he's got them all used to his presence, u know? So I said, are they your kids and he says, no theyre from next door. And now i think of it, they ARE from next door. BUT THIS IS FREAKY BIT. And then he goes, 'but this one..' [he puts his arms around the girl stood next to him] 'shes my special girl' and then he pulls her close and kisses her on the head and goes 'love her to bits.' And i'm like WTF, but i didnt show it, i just kinda chuckled and said oh right and then went back home.
But this other time, i was walking past the girls house and her and her mum were looking out a window at 'Clary' and her mum was going 'you're a smooth talker aren't you? piss off!' So i guess she obviously knows.

But still amirite to think its weird, or am i just over reacting?

Btw: whilst typing this, one of spellchecks alternatives was 'peadar'.. is that, a peado radar right? guys, where do i get one?

Monday, 14 September 2009

Postarama woot

Today i had i quick look through my blog folder and realised a huge quantity of of my posts are still sitting behind the scenes as drafts. You probably only see up to about two thirds of the posts i write.

Some of them are long rambling posts i got half way through and abandoned; actually most of those are still in Notepad and aren't even held on this site. Some were too brief- just a link and title left waiting for some intended content that i've clearly forgotten since. On at least one occasion i was going to post something quite fun with lots of links, but it required me to scan a flyer i'd found and i seem to have thrown away since :( The majority were abandoned because at the time i thought they were too boring, or i'd got part way through and had a thought that un-did everything i'd just said.

Anyway, today i went through a few of them and picked out a couple i could polish off and release, and that is the reason why these posts seem out dated or second rate. More might be released in future, especially if that flyer, or another one like it, somehow turns up.

Btw, tomorrow i may post aswell, as 'stuff' happened at the weekend with photos. But i don't know, check tomorrow. Or today, if you're reading this tomorrow, or yesterday as it'll be tomorrow, which'll actually be today, even, or whatever.

On the wings of a paradox

I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume no one here is an avid fan of the daily mail.

Today RobManuel posted this link on twitter. The tagline efficiently sums up the project as: 'Help to make sense of the Daily Mail’s ongoing effort to classify every inanimate object into those that cause cancer and those that prevent it.' The articles from which they are sourced are here.

Well.. dunno 'bout you guys, but it's good to be informed that i can reduce my chances of breast cancer by just getting morning sickness, and that radiation can apparently cause it.

Spot how many contradictions occur throughout the table. Red wine seems to be the most frequent, and each time the pill is mentioned it seems to be conclusively responsible for one or the other. Sex is another thing they're undecidedly certain about. Also 'work' re-occurs throughout the 'causes' column, and we know how daily mail readers feel about those who don't work.

I guess the truth is many of these items are responsible for solving one problem, but then cause another. Frankly, that's just the ebb and flow of life, nature and all it touches so far as i can tell.

So i guess the only thing we can learn from the daily mail today is: Sooner or later, one thing or another is going to get you. So why waste your life panicking about it in shitty newspapers?

Sunday Morning Debates: ignorance is bliss

In the mornings, i tend to debate things with myself. It's still early, so i'll allow it to spill over on the internet. Good idea? Bad? Dunno.
I was watching a mildly humorous retelling of harry potter last night, narrated by an 'alcoholic wizard'. The whole film is on youtube, this is just chapter 9.


Amusing narrations aside, it fascinates me how harry potter, and others- Discworld, Middle Earth, Azeroth etc are those exciting fantasy worlds people get so entranced and absorbed by. It can be so absorbing that people will happily spend their wages on fake encyclopedias, maps and even cookbooks, and this is still not enough for some people who simply cannot be persuaded to leave that world. That's pretty potent, isnt it?


Aside from just 'looking different', the awareness and beliefs in these realms are fundamentally different from our world, in that they're worlds full of 'magical' unknowns.

For example, in Mr. Potters adventure there's a moment where you see the snitch before it's turned on. Its a metallic looking ball with "wings" that essentially look like bits of wire. How can wire flex so rapidly? Let alone make a metal ball fly? Your simple answer is.. you're now in a world where that just happens, you can't explain how, so don't even try. Mythical creatures do lurk in the forest, people do turn into animals and tiny stones do hold legendary power. There's no explanation, other than the fact you don't know enough about this world to argue with it. The viewer is now in a world that is very powerful, and they are very innocent.

This kind of gives a sense of exciting freedom. There are no 'laws' dictating what is and isn't possible. Anything could happen tomorrow. It also gives a sense of hope. Any problem could, potentially, be solved. How can you assume that there is no one watching, and nothing out there?

It seems to me the majority of these worlds are inspired at least partially by the Age of Faith, or pre-Age-of-Reason times, when ignorance left holes that were lovingly filled by religious and superstitious beliefs. This was a time when living creatures were born from rocks (or in the case of mice "a piece of soiled cloth plus wheat for 21 days", people's personalities were defined by excess bodily fluids, creatures the size of small islands await submerged out at sea, and spirituality overrode science as a reason for doing anything. People had no choice but to believe what they heard, and no doubt they saw the world as an imaginative, scary and limitless one.

Ironically, in modern life, by shunning ignorance and pursuing knowledge we actually have become capable of more, yet we feel more limited. By knowing all about physical laws, we're constantly aware of what can't happen. Experts are keen to remind us that telekinesis isn't real, there's no cure for cancer, and essentially all the land on the planet is mapped. We know virtually all the creatures and have categorised them several times over already. Mysterious, supernatural phenomena are always met as soon as possible with some boring rational explanation- and if not then we are informed they couldn't have actually happened at all. If you like the unknown, you may find that more depressing.

Having said all this.. We are no doubt on the innocent side of many paradigm shifts yet to come. Today's unknown is in the future, probably the sub-atomic, and space. In the future, there may or may not be spaceships.. we don't know.. If there are, we'll probably think it no more spectacular than today's cars. Right now, spacecraft are full of wondrous, innocent speculation, but when they are made, they will operate within known physical law like everything else, and overlooked as mundane tools by their generation.

Anyway i had no plan for where this was gonna go, so i guess ill stop there with that point. Ignorance is exciting bliss, and knowledge is predictable power. And humans will just have to fantasise about one or the other.

Shake it baby

People are complaining about this app because it's offensive.

If i have any complaints about it, it's because it's a shit app. Look what happens. You get a picture of a baby, you shake the phone, and red arial bold X's appear on its eyes. That's it? That game sucks. In fact i dont think it even counts as a game. And it gets worse.. you actually had to pay for it! How did no one feel ripped off by that?

Come on people, if you're going to be all controversial and sick at least put some fucking effort in. And if you're going to jump to the defense of this because 'its just a joke!' then go research humour.

Friday, 11 September 2009

And if you don't agree then you're a fag, or something

If theres one thing that really annoys me it's the petty, mindless side of journalism. You know, braindead morons writing for more braindead morons in Braindead Moron Weekly; who have nothing better to do than make up stupid stories like people leaving cameras recording all day in other peoples bathrooms.

More specifically though, journalists in the entertainment world who do not respect, or maybe even understand, the essential gap between journalism and advertising. I'll cut to the chase and say specifically, i'm referring to game journalists bent on turning every review into a competition to produce the most unnecessarily wild, irrationally extreme statement that can be contained in one phrase. Note: this does not mean the phrases say anything about the actual game in question.. and rarely actually do.

Basically, is it just me, or is anyone else out there sick to death of "this game... " quotes, like:

"This game should not be sold without spare underwear!!"

"The god particle is really just this game, only smaller!"

"[This game is] So hardcore it'll tear your face off!"


"This game will get you drunk, and laid!! Trust us!!"

Er.. seriously? Wii Game Party is going to get me drunk and laid? Whats with the assumption i wouldn't get drunk and laid anyway? And "trust us".. is that a genuine promise or just another sign we should never take anything you say about games even slightly seriously? And in that latter case, does that not undermine your whole purpose?

Ok, let me just try to work this thing out. Your job is to review games: so that we, the consumers have a vague idea about what's out there, how much of it is good, what's worth our money, and the state of the market generally. Yet the reviewer seems more interested in trying to boost his ego by showing off how amazingly funny he failed to be. That's not to say reviewers should not try to be funny.. just, the fact you review games does NOT make you immune to effort, you know.

It isn't just the lame attempts at mindless extremity that annoys me. It's also the use of vague cliches. Take a look at this page. Now don't get me wrong- the game looks good, and from what i've heard, it is very good. But most (though not all) of these reviews, frankly, could be randomly picked out a hat and slapped onto any game. The very first one is a brilliant example. And.. 'different'? what exactly does that mean, what's your comparison? The player feedback can also be comfortably read assuming none of them have ever actually played the game (with the exception of beer mode guy. He does actually sound like he's had a go on it).

No doubt some of this frustration comes from being a consumer who has to scan for some intelligent genuine comment, but also as i took a degree in it. I was just looking for some kind of 3D Animation degree, saw a game design course, went for it, and enjoyed every minute of it.. and some of our work was genuinely challenging and utilised a lot of skills. Yet when people asked what i did at uni, i'm almost embarrased and usually resort to just saying, 'oh.. 3d animation.'
Not because i'm embarrased about the course- as said it was awesome, i met amazing people and if i had to go back to uni, without a doubt i'd do it again. It's because i know people instantly think of socially defective 15 year olds spewing brainless humour on the internet from their stuffy bedrooms. Thats ok, because it does happen. But the childish journalism surrounding the industry, where 'BEST EVER' and 'ITS AWESOME!' are slapped onto every other game, is really not helping the stigma the industry's been laden with. I don't think film or music students had that problem. Also, when you've spent a year or two on level design you start to appreciate just how much effort goes into these games- and just how insulting it can be that some reviewers clearly havent bothered to take 5 minutes to actually check it out.

I've probably got this all wrong, and its just me thinking this, but from what ive said to people, it doesn't seem like it is just me. Game reviews do not have to have this approach- there is plenty of interesting and intelligent things to say about games. My friend this guy can do it, for one thing. In the case of my last paragraph, i was concerned that maybe games shouldn't be taken seriously, but as he reassuringly pointed out: 'if my job is reviewing toasters, it doesn't matter if toasters are important, i should actually review them instead of turning it into a showcase of comedy talents.' which i pretty much agree with- only in the case of some i'd've put 'talents' in inverted commas.

Thats pretty much all i should allow myself to say. It's getting late, and i won't appreciate that in the morning.